Re: [PATCH 013 of 35] Don't update bi_hw_*_size if we aren't going to merge.

On Thursday August 2, [email protected] wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12:16:55PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> > 
> > ll_merge_requests_fn can update bi_hw_*_size in one case where we end
> > up not merging.  This is wrong.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <[email protected]>
> 
> As this is a bug fix, I think it would better to bump this to the top
> of the series such that it can be pushed into mainline.

Good point.  I'll do that, thanks.

NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 000 of 35] Refactor block layer to improve support for stacked devices.
    • From: NeilBrown <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 013 of 35] Don't update bi_hw_*_size if we aren't going to merge.
    • From: NeilBrown <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 013 of 35] Don't update bi_hw_*_size if we aren't going to merge.
    • From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fix WARN_ON() on bitfield ops for all other archs
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.22: oops in sbp2_remove_device
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 013 of 35] Don't update bi_hw_*_size if we aren't going to merge.
• Next by thread: [PATCH 014 of 35] Change blk_phys/hw_contig_segment to take requests, not bios.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]