Re: [PATCH 013 of 35] Don't update bi_hw_*_size if we aren't going to merge.

On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12:16:55PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> 
> ll_merge_requests_fn can update bi_hw_*_size in one case where we end
> up not merging.  This is wrong.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <[email protected]>

As this is a bug fix, I think it would better to bump this to the top
of the series such that it can be pushed into mainline.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 013 of 35] Don't update bi_hw_*_size if we aren't going to merge.
  - From: Neil Brown <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 000 of 35] Refactor block layer to improve support for stacked devices.
  - From: NeilBrown <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 013 of 35] Don't update bi_hw_*_size if we aren't going to merge.
  - From: NeilBrown <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 38] drivers/char/ip2/ip2main.c: kmalloc + memset conversion to kzalloc
Next by Date: Re: - pci-device-ensure-sysdata-initialised-v3.patch removed from -mm tree
Previous by thread: [PATCH 013 of 35] Don't update bi_hw_*_size if we aren't going to merge.
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 013 of 35] Don't update bi_hw_*_size if we aren't going to merge.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]