On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:45:39AM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > > It is certainly interesting to compare alternative ways of handling the
> > > instruction streams by various processors or models of processors.
> >
> > Well you have to do a lot more work then to handle instable TSCs then.
>
> I have been using this for 2 years. It works fine for my purposes.
That might be on your systems, but for a mainline submission the
standards are higher.
>
> > In particular the frequencies can be different between CPUs, they
> > change (which you can catch with cpufreq notifiers) and during the
> > cpufreq change period they're instable (as in you can't tell for
> > some time which frequency they're currently running at and they
> > might be running immediate frequencies)
>
> Well then simply make sure that they do not change while you measure.
That would be a merge blocker in my opinion. Suitable for local
hacks, but nothing we want in tree.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
