Re: [PATCH 2/7] Simple Performance Counters: x86_64 support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:

> > It is certainly interesting to compare alternative ways of handling the 
> > instruction streams by various processors or models of processors.
> 
> Well you have to do a lot more work then to handle instable TSCs then.

I have been using this for 2 years. It works fine for my purposes.

> In particular the frequencies can be different between CPUs, they 
> change (which you can catch with cpufreq notifiers) and during the
> cpufreq change period they're instable (as in you can't tell for
> some time which frequency they're currently running at and they
> might be running immediate frequencies) 

Well then simply make sure that they do not change while you measure.
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux