Hello.
Segher Boessenkool wrote:
+ ide@f0000000 {
+ compatible = "mmio-ide";
+ device_type = "ide";
Why not "ata"?
The hardware is called (E)IDE, the protocol is called ATA.
Sorry for not denouncing this earlier. :-)
ATA is the name of ANSI standard describing IDE.
Or that's what I was told --
Re-check your sources. ;-)
> I think there's some historic revisionism involved, too.
IDE was probably an initial name of the infamous disk hardware/protocol
later standardized as ATA, EIDE (being more of a trademark) more or less
equals to ATA-2.
Also, what mmio-ide in the compat properly means in the context of
ide_platform which is able to handle both port and memory mapped IDE.
I think
we must get rid with this crap, and since this IDE register mapping is
pretty
much board specific, call it something like "mpc8349emitx-ide" instead.
"mmio-ide" simply is not specific enough. The device_type
Yes.
should go, too.
If this IDE interface is board-specific, thee "compatible"
It's "thy", not "thee". ;-)
property should include the board vendor name and board
name. Oh, that's what "emitx" tries to do -- it could be
a bit clearer perhaps ;-)
Yeah, I forgot about the vondor's "fsl," prefix.
Segher
MBR, Sergei
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]