Re: [PATCH 06/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/frv

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 7/27/07, Robin Getz <[email protected]> wrote:
If there is a definite style or semantic preference that everyone should live
with - does it make sense to put checks in checkpatch.pl to enforce it?

checkpatch.pl does not have enough semantic knowledge to know if the
thing being tested is a pointer ... dont know if the sparse utility
would be able to pick it out as i'm not familiar with what level that
thing runs at
Didn't he mean "x == NULL" > "!x"?

Richard Knutsson
(wrote this offline so if someone has already reply, then sorry about the noise)


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux