Re: [PATCH 06/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/frv

David Howells <[email protected]> writes:

> Yoann Padioleau <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> When comparing a pointer, it's clearer to compare it to NULL than to 0.
>
> Can you make them of style:
>
> 	if (!x)

Yes I can. I can make another semantic patch later to do that
transformation. But some people may prefer (x == NULL) to (!x)
so I don't know. I think that transformation 
some 0 to NULL is less controversial.


>
> instead?
>
> Thanks,
> David

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 06/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/frv
    • From: Robin Getz <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 06/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/frv
    • From: Yoann Padioleau <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 06/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/frv
    • From: David Howells <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 04/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/blackfin
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 06/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/frv
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 06/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/frv
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 06/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/frv
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]