On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 02:57 -0700, Bill Huey wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 09:15:17AM +0800, Carlo Florendo wrote:
> >
> > We obviously all saw how the particular authors tried to address the
> > issues. Ingo tried to address all concerns while Con simply ranted about
> > his scheduler being better. If this is what you think about being a bit
> > more human, then I think that this has no place in the lkml.
>
> That's highly inaccurate and rather disrespect of Con's experience.
> There as a policy decision made with SD that one person basically didn't
> like, this person whined like a baby for the a formula bottle and didn't
> understand how to use "nice" to control this inherent behavior of this
> scheduler.
Chuckle. You are really desperate for entertainment.
-Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
