On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:09:38 +0200
Michael Buesch <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Monday 30 July 2007, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Michael Buesch wrote:
> >
> > > On Sunday 29 July 2007 23:34, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > > > The Host AP driver uses a semaphore as mutex. Use the mutex API
> > > > instead of the (binary) semaphore.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <[email protected]>
> >
> > [ Something seems to have gone wrong with your diff / patch / script.
> > There was no diff header here, which should have been. ]
> >
> > > > - res = down_interruptible(&local->rid_bap_sem);
> > > > + res = mutex_lock_interruptible(&local->rid_bap_mtx);
> > > > if (res)
> > > > return res;
> > > >
> > > > @@ -902,7 +902,7 @@ static int hfa384x_set_rid(struct net_device *dev, u16 rid, void *buf, int len)
> > > > /* RID len in words and +1 for rec.rid */
> > > > rec.len = cpu_to_le16(len / 2 + len % 2 + 1);
> > > >
> > > > - res = down_interruptible(&local->rid_bap_sem);
> > > > + res = mutex_lock_interruptible(&local->rid_bap_mtx);
> > > > if (res)
> > > > return res;
> > > >
> > >
> > > Is res returned to userspace? If yes, that's not right.
> >
> > Yup, that's not right.
> >
> > > On a interrupted mutex allocation you should return
> > > -ERESTARTSYS to userspace.
> >
> > Nope, userspace must not see ERESTARTSYS (I /think/ this is the third
> > time I'm participating in this exact same discussion :-)
> >
> > If the return would be caught by a previous in-kernel caller in the
> > call chain, ERESTARTSYS is okay and it could try to restart the
> > operation. However, if the return goes unfiltered directly to
> > userspace, EINTR is the correct choice.
>
> Last time I submitted a patch which returned EINTR to userspace,
> people came and said it was wrong. It was said that we must
> return ERESTARTSYS to the libc and the libc will convert that
> into either EINTR or automatically restart it immediately.
> (You can set that in the sigaction stuff).
>
> So either the one who told me that last time was wrong, or you. :)
>
> Andrew? I think you were involved in this discussion I mentioned.
> (It was about the HW-RNG chardev, but that doesn't matter here).
who, me? signals? Danger.
yes, I think ERESTARTSYS is correct. That gets converted to -EINTR by the
arch's signal handling code (not by glibc) just before we return to
userspace.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]