Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> <large snip>

Hello, I have a gaming rig and would love to help benchmark with my copy
of UT2004(E6600 Core2 and a 7950GTO card). Or if you have anything else
that would better serve as a benchmark I could grab it and try.

The only problem is I don't know what 2 kernels I should be using to
test the schedulers. I assume 2.6.23-rc1 for CFS, but what about SD?

-- 
Kenneth Prugh

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Linus 2.6.23-rc1
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • SD still better than CFS for 3d (was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
    • From: Kasper Sandberg <[email protected]>
  • Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/8] i386: bitops: Cleanup, sanitize, optimize
• Previous by thread: Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
• Next by thread: Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]