Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)

[Kenneth Prugh <ken69267@gmail.com>]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> <large snip>

Hello, I have a gaming rig and would love to help benchmark with my copy
of UT2004(E6600 Core2 and a 7950GTO card). Or if you have anything else
that would better serve as a benchmark I could grab it and try.

The only problem is I don't know what 2 kernels I should be using to
test the schedulers. I assume 2.6.23-rc1 for CFS, but what about SD?

-- 
Kenneth Prugh

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature