Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]

["Ray Lee" <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>]

On 7/29/07, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> wrote:
> Ray wrote:
> > Ah, so in a normal scenario where a working-set is getting faulted
> > back in, we have the swap storage as well as the file-backed stuff
> > that needs to be read as well. So even if swap is organized perfectly,
> > we're still seeking. Damn.
>
> Perhaps this applies in some cases ... perhaps.

Yeah, point taken: better data would make this a lot easier to figure
out and target fixes.

Ray
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/