Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]

On 7/29/07, Paul Jackson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ray wrote:
> > Ah, so in a normal scenario where a working-set is getting faulted
> > back in, we have the swap storage as well as the file-backed stuff
> > that needs to be read as well. So even if swap is organized perfectly,
> > we're still seeking. Damn.
>
> Perhaps this applies in some cases ... perhaps.

Yeah, point taken: better data would make this a lot easier to figure
out and target fixes.

Ray
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
    • From: "Jesper Juhl" <[email protected]>
  • Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
    • From: Rene Herman <[email protected]>
  • Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
    • From: Rene Herman <[email protected]>
  • Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
    • From: "Ray Lee" <[email protected]>
  • Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
    • From: Rene Herman <[email protected]>
  • Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
    • From: "Ray Lee" <[email protected]>
  • Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
  • Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
    • From: "Ray Lee" <[email protected]>
  • Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Reading a bad sector does not report failure as 'read error' but hangs PC with 'Machine Check Exception'
• Next by Date: Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1
• Previous by thread: Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
• Next by thread: Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]