Ray wrote:
> Ah, so in a normal scenario where a working-set is getting faulted
> back in, we have the swap storage as well as the file-backed stuff
> that needs to be read as well. So even if swap is organized perfectly,
> we're still seeking. Damn.
Perhaps this applies in some cases ... perhaps.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: "Jesper Juhl" <[email protected]>
- Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- From: Rene Herman <[email protected]>
- Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- From: Rene Herman <[email protected]>
- Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- From: Rene Herman <[email protected]>
- Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- From: "Ray Lee" <[email protected]>
- Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- From: Rene Herman <[email protected]>
- Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- From: "Ray Lee" <[email protected]>
- Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- From: "Ray Lee" <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 2.6.23 2/2] iw_cxgb3: Always call low level send function via cxgb3_ofld_send().
- Next by Date: Re: Reading a bad sector does not report failure as 'read error' but hangs PC with 'Machine Check Exception'
- Previous by thread: Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- Next by thread: Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- Index(es):
 |