Re: [PATCH 01/10] Task Containers(V11): Basic task container framework

["Paul Menage" <menage@google.com>]

On 7/26/07, YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp> wrote:
> > +Other fields in the container_subsys object include:
>
> > +- hierarchy: an index indicating which hierarchy, if any, this
> > +  subsystem is currently attached to. If this is -1, then the
> > +  subsystem is not attached to any hierarchy, and all tasks should be
> > +  considered to be members of the subsystem's top_container. It should
> > +  be initialized to -1.
>
> stale info?

Yes, I think so. I really need to do a proper pass over
Documentation/containers.txt one more time following a bunch of recent
changes.

>
> > +struct container {
>
> > +     struct containerfs_root *root;
> > +     struct container *top_container;
> > +};
>
> can cont->top_container be different from than &cont->root.top_container?

No, I guess it can't. And there are only a couple of places using
cont->top_container now, so I should probably remove it.

Thanks,

Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/