Re: LinuxPPS & spinlocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rodolfo Giometti wrote:

What do you mean? Did you find an error into my patch? :-o

Functions pps_event() and
pps_register_source()/pps_unregister_source() take accesso to shared
data, that's why I used spinlocks.

My point is that the lock should be used to protect specific data. Thus, it would be more correct to say, "spinlock foo is taken because pps_register_source() accesses variable bar".

That way, if someone else wants to access "bar", they know that they need to take lock "foo".

Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux