Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
The pps_event() is now protected by a spinlock against pps_register_source() and pps_unregister_source()...
Locks protect data, not code. It may make more sense to identify the specific data being protected by the spinlock.
Chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: LinuxPPS & spinlocks
- From: Rodolfo Giometti <[email protected]>
- Re: LinuxPPS & spinlocks
- References:
- [PATCH] LinuxPPS - definitive version
- From: Rodolfo Giometti <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS - definitive version
- From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS - definitive version
- From: Rodolfo Giometti <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS - definitive version
- From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS - definitive version
- From: Rodolfo Giometti <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS - definitive version
- From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
- LinuxPPS & spinlocks
- From: Rodolfo Giometti <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] LinuxPPS - definitive version
- Prev by Date: Re: serial flow control appears broken
- Next by Date: Kernel modules compilation
- Previous by thread: LinuxPPS & spinlocks
- Next by thread: Re: LinuxPPS & spinlocks
- Index(es):
 |