* David J. Wilder ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> >I guess they might have to switch to such an asynchronous delivery
> >system if they want to do this properly. Simply put, your polling
> >solution is exactly what I do, but I check a flag set by the writer
> >instead of waking up the readers unconditionally.
> >
> >Mathieu
> >
>
> Ingo's solution could call waitqueue_active() inside wakeup_readers() to
> determine if there are waiters. Right?
>
Yes and no.. What would be part of it, but also checking if there are
buffers ready to be read would reduce the unnecessary polling even more.
Just checking for waiting readers would be rather inefficient in a
scenario of infrequent events where the readers are always waiting for
data; they would be awakened at every timer tick.
Mathieu
> >
> >> Ingo
> >>
> >>------------------------------------->
> >>Subject: relay: fix timer madness
> >>From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
> >>
> >>remove timer calls (!!!) from deep within the tracing infrastructure.
> >>This was totally bogus code that can cause lockups and worse.
> >>Poll the buffer every 2 jiffies for now.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
> >>---
> >> kernel/relay.c | 14 +++++---------
> >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>Index: linux-rt-rebase.q/kernel/relay.c
> >>===================================================================
> >>--- linux-rt-rebase.q.orig/kernel/relay.c
> >>+++ linux-rt-rebase.q/kernel/relay.c
> >>@@ -319,6 +319,10 @@ static void wakeup_readers(unsigned long
> >> {
> >> struct rchan_buf *buf = (struct rchan_buf *)data;
> >> wake_up_interruptible(&buf->read_wait);
> >>+ /*
> >>+ * Stupid polling for now:
> >>+ */
> >>+ mod_timer(&buf->timer, jiffies + 1);
> >> }
> >>
> >> /**
> >>@@ -336,6 +340,7 @@ static void __relay_reset(struct rchan_b
> >> init_waitqueue_head(&buf->read_wait);
> >> kref_init(&buf->kref);
> >> setup_timer(&buf->timer, wakeup_readers, (unsigned long)buf);
> >>+ mod_timer(&buf->timer, jiffies + 1);
> >> } else
> >> del_timer_sync(&buf->timer);
> >>
> >>@@ -604,15 +609,6 @@ size_t relay_switch_subbuf(struct rchan_
> >> buf->subbufs_produced++;
> >> buf->dentry->d_inode->i_size += buf->chan->subbuf_size -
> >> buf->padding[old_subbuf];
> >>- smp_mb();
> >>- if (waitqueue_active(&buf->read_wait))
> >>- /*
> >>- * Calling wake_up_interruptible() from here
> >>- * will deadlock if we happen to be logging
> >>- * from the scheduler (trying to re-grab
> >>- * rq->lock), so defer it.
> >>- */
> >>- __mod_timer(&buf->timer, jiffies + 1);
> >> }
> >>
> >> old = buf->data;
> >>
> >
> >
>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
