Re: [PATCH] IPv6: ipv6_addr_type() doesn't know about RFC4193 addresses

Hello.

In article <[email protected]> (at Wed, 25 Jul 2007 19:49:09 -0400), Dave Johnson <[email protected]> says:

> ipv6_addr_type() doesn't check for 'Unique Local IPv6 Unicast
> Addresses' (RFC4193) and returns IPV6_ADDR_RESERVED for that range.

Acked-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[email protected]>

I would say, it would be better to add IPV6_ADDR_UNICAST as well
for "reserved" addresses unless we have good reason not to do it,
anyway.

-- 
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki @ USAGI Project  <[email protected]>
GPG-FP  : 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF  80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] IPv6: ipv6_addr_type() doesn't know about RFC4193 addresses
    • From: David Miller <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] IPv6: ipv6_addr_type() doesn't know about RFC4193 addresses
    • From: Dave Johnson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] make schedule_on_each_cpu() look like on_each_cpu()
• Next by Date: Re: [Question] Hooks for scheduler tracing (CFS)
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: ipv6_addr_type() doesn't know about RFC4193 addresses
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: ipv6_addr_type() doesn't know about RFC4193 addresses
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]