On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 14:08 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On 7/26/07, Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote: > > --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/slub.c > > +++ linux-2.6/mm/slub.c > > @@ -1656,6 +1656,7 @@ static void __always_inline slab_free(st > > unsigned long flags; > > > > local_irq_save(flags); > > + debug_check_no_locks_freed(object, s->size); > > Although it doesn't matter much, I think this should be s->objsize. Christoph? Ah, I think you are right, s->size includes all the padding and redzones. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [bug] SLUB & freeing locks [was: Re: 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions with patches]
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [bug] SLUB & freeing locks [was: Re: 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions with patches]
- References:
- 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions with patches
- From: Michal Piotrowski <[email protected]>
- [bug] SLUB & freeing locks [was: Re: 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions with patches]
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [bug] SLUB & freeing locks [was: Re: 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions with patches]
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [bug] SLUB & freeing locks [was: Re: 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions with patches]
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [bug] SLUB & freeing locks [was: Re: 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions with patches]
- From: "Pekka Enberg" <[email protected]>
- 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions with patches
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] make schedule_on_each_cpu() look like on_each_cpu()
- Next by Date: Re: [patch] nfs: fix locking in nfs/inode.c in nfs_free_open_context
- Previous by thread: Re: [bug] SLUB & freeing locks [was: Re: 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions with patches]
- Next by thread: Re: [bug] SLUB & freeing locks [was: Re: 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions with patches]
- Index(es):
 |