On 7/26/07, Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/slub.c
+++ linux-2.6/mm/slub.c
@@ -1656,6 +1656,7 @@ static void __always_inline slab_free(st
unsigned long flags;
local_irq_save(flags);
+ debug_check_no_locks_freed(object, s->size);
Although it doesn't matter much, I think this should be s->objsize. Christoph?
Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [bug] SLUB & freeing locks [was: Re: 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions with patches]
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [bug] SLUB & freeing locks [was: Re: 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions with patches]
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [bug] SLUB & freeing locks [was: Re: 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions with patches]
- References:
- 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions with patches
- From: Michal Piotrowski <[email protected]>
- [bug] SLUB & freeing locks [was: Re: 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions with patches]
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [bug] SLUB & freeing locks [was: Re: 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions with patches]
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [bug] SLUB & freeing locks [was: Re: 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions with patches]
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions with patches
- Prev by Date: Re: [Question] Hooks for scheduler tracing (CFS)
- Next by Date: [PATCH] make schedule_on_each_cpu() look like on_each_cpu()
- Previous by thread: Re: [bug] SLUB & freeing locks [was: Re: 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions with patches]
- Next by thread: Re: [bug] SLUB & freeing locks [was: Re: 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions with patches]
- Index(es):
 |