"Peter Bortas" <[email protected]> writes:
> On 7/21/07, Adrian McMenamin <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 21/07/07, Peter Bortas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Sidenote: Does Linux handle the Dreamcast DMA errata?
>> >
>>
>> You need to explain what you mean (at least to me!).
>>
>> If you mean will it degrade gracefully - not without this patch if set
>> to the (correct) defconfig. With iffy settings it will.
>
> If I remember correctly (and that's a big if since I last looked at it
> in 2001) some revisions of the Dreamcast hardware would sporadically
> lock up if you scheduled a new DMA request to quickly after a previous
> one, even if you checked the ready bit. It's worked around by a delay
> of X microseconds as recommended by Sega engineers. I don't remember
> the value of X, nor where exactly in the flow this workaround should
> be applied.
>
> Adding Marcus in case he has a better memory than me.
I don't remeber any such delay. Are you sure you're not thinking
about the G2 bus problem (where accesses need to be programatically
serialized, whether they are PIO or DMA)?
// Marcus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
