* John Sigler <[email protected]> wrote: > > does your test-app have higher priority than softirq--4 ? > > PID 4 is [softirq-timer/0] and has priority 50 in SCHED_FIFO. My > process has priority 80 in SCHED_RR. It is waiting for IRQ10. > > My user-space app has higher priority than everything except PID 2 > which is [posix_cpu_timer] well what priority does the IRQ 10 kernel thread have? It should be prio 80 too if it's in your critical path. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pin-pointing the root of unusual application latencies
- From: John Sigler <[email protected]>
- Re: Pin-pointing the root of unusual application latencies
- References:
- Re: Pin-pointing the root of unusual application latencies
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: Pin-pointing the root of unusual application latencies
- From: John Sigler <[email protected]>
- Re: Pin-pointing the root of unusual application latencies
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: Pin-pointing the root of unusual application latencies
- From: John Sigler <[email protected]>
- Re: Pin-pointing the root of unusual application latencies
- From: John Sigler <[email protected]>
- Re: Pin-pointing the root of unusual application latencies
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: Pin-pointing the root of unusual application latencies
- From: John Sigler <[email protected]>
- Re: Pin-pointing the root of unusual application latencies
- Prev by Date: [PATCH -mm] fix order of container subsystems in init/Kconfig
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH]: allow individual core dump methods to be unlimited when sending to a pipe
- Previous by thread: Re: Pin-pointing the root of unusual application latencies
- Next by thread: Re: Pin-pointing the root of unusual application latencies
- Index(es):
 |