* John Sigler <[email protected]> wrote: > >With a pair of the following in the middle: > > > >softirq--4 0.... 670us : call_rcu (rt_run_flush) > >softirq--4 0D..1 670us : __rcu_advance_callbacks (call_rcu) > Any idea what went wrong in the above function trace? Why is the > kernel spinning in circles that way? does your test-app have higher priority than softirq--4 ? Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pin-pointing the root of unusual application latencies
- From: John Sigler <[email protected]>
- Re: Pin-pointing the root of unusual application latencies
- References:
- Re: Pin-pointing the root of unusual application latencies
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: Pin-pointing the root of unusual application latencies
- From: John Sigler <[email protected]>
- Re: Pin-pointing the root of unusual application latencies
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: Pin-pointing the root of unusual application latencies
- From: John Sigler <[email protected]>
- Re: Pin-pointing the root of unusual application latencies
- From: John Sigler <[email protected]>
- Re: Pin-pointing the root of unusual application latencies
- Prev by Date: Re: Pin-pointing the root of unusual application latencies
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] add __GFP_ZERO to GFP_LEVEL_MASK
- Previous by thread: Re: Pin-pointing the root of unusual application latencies
- Next by thread: Re: Pin-pointing the root of unusual application latencies
- Index(es):
 |