Hi. On Tuesday 24 July 2007 00:29:55 Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 23:05 +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > Hi all. > > > > As we all know, pageflags have been a scarce resource for a while now. These > > patches seek to help address that issue by adding support for a new type > > of 'dynamically allocated' pageflag. > > > but... does this really solve it? I mean.. you can still run out... so > then what? Well, the intention is that you can use this implementation instead for flags where the performance hit doesn't matter [so much]. Regards, Nigel -- See http://www.tuxonice.net for Howtos, FAQs, mailing lists, wiki and bugzilla info.
Attachment:
pgpMaPJkhypgf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- [RFC] [PATCH 0/5] Dynamically allocated pageflags.
- From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/5] Dynamically allocated pageflags.
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- [RFC] [PATCH 0/5] Dynamically allocated pageflags.
- Prev by Date: Re: Documentation for sysfs, hotplug, and firmware loading.
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/6] cpuset aware writeback
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/5] Dynamically allocated pageflags.
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/5] Dynamically allocated pageflags.
- Index(es):