Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/5] Dynamically allocated pageflags.

On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 23:05 +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi all.
> 
> As we all know, pageflags have been a scarce resource for a while now. These 
> patches seek to help address that issue by adding support for a new type 
> of 'dynamically allocated' pageflag.


but... does this really solve it? I mean.. you can still run out... so
then what?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/5] Dynamically allocated pageflags.
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC] [PATCH 0/5] Dynamically allocated pageflags.
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] spinlock in function hugetlb_fault could be deleted
• Next by Date: Re: [1/2] 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/5] Dynamically allocated pageflags.
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/5] Dynamically allocated pageflags.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]