Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/5] Dynamically allocated pageflags.

On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 23:05 +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi all.
> 
> As we all know, pageflags have been a scarce resource for a while now. These 
> patches seek to help address that issue by adding support for a new type 
> of 'dynamically allocated' pageflag.


but... does this really solve it? I mean.. you can still run out... so
then what?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/5] Dynamically allocated pageflags.
  - From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>

References:
- [RFC] [PATCH 0/5] Dynamically allocated pageflags.
  - From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] spinlock in function hugetlb_fault could be deleted
Next by Date: Re: [1/2] 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/5] Dynamically allocated pageflags.
Next by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/5] Dynamically allocated pageflags.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]