On 7/21/07, Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:
On Saturday 21 July 2007 13:21:34 Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On 7/21/07, Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Saturday 21 July 2007 09:56:15 Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > > please check my version, we should use core id bits instead.
> > >
> > > it should replace
> > > [PATCH for review] [37/48] x86_64: make k8topology multi-core aware
> >
> > Yes, you're right the patch is not good. It should probably use
> > information from the regular CPU setup code, not touch cpuid
> > directly
>
> need move some code into early_identify_cpu from identify_cpu in
> arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c
> then could use that bits in bsp cpu info.
Yes something like this
> BTW:
> it seems for BSP only early_identify_cpu is called, and identify_cpu
> is only use in smp_callin for AP. Do i miss sth.
identify_cpu calls early_identify_cpu as first thing.
the calling to identify_cpu in BSP is in check_bugs(). It is easy to
ignore it...
maybe we could move that to setup_arch directly.
YH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]