Re: [PATCH] fix theoretical ccids_{read,write}_lock() race

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 19:02:06 +0400 Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> wrote:

> Make sure that spin_unlock_wait() is properly ordered wrt atomic_inc().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
> 
> --- t/net/dccp/ccid.c~ccid	2006-12-18 18:17:31.000000000 +0300
> +++ t/net/dccp/ccid.c	2007-07-21 18:29:21.000000000 +0400
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ static inline void ccids_write_unlock(vo
>  static inline void ccids_read_lock(void)
>  {
>  	atomic_inc(&ccids_lockct);
> +	smp_mb__after_atomic_inc();
>  	spin_unlock_wait(&ccids_lock);
>  }
>  

Why not just use standard rwlocks in there?

(This is probably an FAQ, but it should be).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/