Re: blackfin - cmpxchg not atomic ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/21/07, Robert Schwebel <[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 04:36:12PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > Also, does you assembly stub _really_ modify memory atomically ? If yes,
> > then there should be no need for disabling interrupts. Else, I see a
> > major problem with SMP.
>
> that isnt the only problem with SMP on Blackfin

Could you ealborate?

i'm pretty sure there's already been a thread on LKML about it ... the
fact that our parts currently lack any sort of cache snooping or
control over any other is a huge issue.

we've contracted a company to do SMP, but it'll have quite a bit of
overhead since it'll need to do a lot of communication/message passing
between cores to account for these hardware deficiencies.
-mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux