Re: [PATCH] Move KVM, paravirt, lguest, VMI and Xen under arch-level Virtualization option

On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 11:10:54PM -0700, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> I'm rather indifferent on the matter, but I think a virtualization menu 
> under UML would be very confusing.

Yeah, that would be interesting.  Trying to get one menu, with
switches that the arch can turn on and off, seems to make sense if you
can get away without too many switches.

				Jeff

-- 
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] Move KVM, paravirt, lguest, VMI and Xen under arch-level Virtualization option
  - From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Move KVM, paravirt, lguest, VMI and Xen under arch-level Virtualization option
  - From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Move KVM, paravirt, lguest, VMI and Xen under arch-level Virtualization option
  - From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Move KVM, paravirt, lguest, VMI and Xen under arch-level Virtualization option
  - From: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: ata_piix broken in 2.6.22
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] fallout from kbuild changes
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Move KVM, paravirt, lguest, VMI and Xen under arch-level Virtualization option
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Move KVM, paravirt, lguest, VMI and Xen under arch-level Virtualization option
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]