Re: [PATCH] Move KVM, paravirt, lguest, VMI and Xen under arch-level Virtualization option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rusty Russell wrote:
Otherwise we end up with $NARCH copies of that Kconfig, each slightly
different.  The top-level entry can be made to depend on the archs that
actually have some virt capability, so as not to show empty an menu.

I dislike the duplication, too, but
1) it's a CPU capability, and that's where it belongs in the menu.
2) And as you can see from the difference between the x86_64 and i386
help text, there are real platform differences (and not mentioning
what's under the menu would be kinda cheating).
3) Virtualization doesn't even make sense as an option for some
platforms where it's always on.

I'm rather indifferent on the matter, but I think a virtualization menu under UML would be very confusing.

Zach
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux