Re: cmpxchg is not available to generic code

From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 01:21:41 -0700

> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:15:03 +1000 "Dave Airlie" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Maybe we could add CONFIG_HAVE_CMPXCHG and let DRM depend on it..
> 
> That would certainly be better than adding a sprinkle of architectures
> in DRM Kconfig dependencies.
> 
> I don't know how important DRM is on ARM.  Zero?

We already have EMULATED_CMPXCHG guarding DRM.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: cmpxchg is not available to generic code
    • From: David Miller <[email protected]>
  • Re: cmpxchg is not available to generic code
    • From: "Dave Airlie" <[email protected]>
  • Re: cmpxchg is not available to generic code
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patches] new text patching for review
• Next by Date: [PATCH] user namespace: fix copy_user_ns return value
• Previous by thread: Re: cmpxchg is not available to generic code
• Next by thread: Re: cmpxchg is not available to generic code
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]