Re: cmpxchg is not available to generic code

On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:15:03 +1000 "Dave Airlie" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Maybe we could add CONFIG_HAVE_CMPXCHG and let DRM depend on it..

That would certainly be better than adding a sprinkle of architectures
in DRM Kconfig dependencies.

I don't know how important DRM is on ARM.  Zero?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: cmpxchg is not available to generic code
  - From: David Miller <[email protected]>
- Re: cmpxchg is not available to generic code
  - From: "Dave Airlie" <[email protected]>

References:
- cmpxchg is not available to generic code
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: cmpxchg is not available to generic code
  - From: David Miller <[email protected]>
- Re: cmpxchg is not available to generic code
  - From: "Dave Airlie" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: cmpxchg is not available to generic code
Next by Date: Re: [NFS] [PATCH 4/5] knfsd: move EX_RDONLY out of header
Previous by thread: Re: cmpxchg is not available to generic code
Next by thread: Re: cmpxchg is not available to generic code
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]