Re: [PATCH] hugetlbfs read() support

On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 10:07:59AM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> But I do think a second reason to do this is to make hugetlbfs behave
> like a normal fs -- that is read(), write(), etc. work on files in the
> mountpoint. But that is simply my opinion.

Mine as well.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] hugetlbfs read() support
  - From: dean gaudet <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] hugetlbfs read() support
  - From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] hugetlbfs read() support
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] hugetlbfs read() support
  - From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] hugetlbfs read() support
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] hugetlbfs read() support
  - From: Nishanth Aravamudan <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] [scsi] lpfc: potential leak in lpfc_sli_hbqbuf_fill_hbqs
Next by Date: Re: Keyboard programming needs root
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] hugetlbfs read() support
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] hugetlbfs read() support
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]