Re: [BUGFIX]{PATCH] flush icache on ia64 take2

On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:15:03 +0200
Zoltan Menyhart <[email protected]> wrote:

> We may have, say 1 Gbyte / sec local i/o activity (using some RAIDs).
> Assume a few % of this 1 Gbyte is the program execution, or program swap in.
> It gives some hundreds of new exec pages / sec =>
> some msec-s can be lost each sec.
> 
> I can agree that it should not be a big deal :-)
> 
Hmm...but the current code flushes the page. just do it in "lazy" way.
much difference ?

-Kame
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [BUGFIX]{PATCH] flush icache on ia64 take2
    • From: Zoltan Menyhart <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [BUGFIX]{PATCH] flush icache on ia64 take2
    • From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
  • Re: [BUGFIX]{PATCH] flush icache on ia64 take2
    • From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
  • Re: [BUGFIX]{PATCH] flush icache on ia64 take2
    • From: Zoltan Menyhart <[email protected]>
  • Re: [BUGFIX]{PATCH] flush icache on ia64 take2
    • From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
  • Re: [BUGFIX]{PATCH] flush icache on ia64 take2
    • From: Zoltan Menyhart <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH for review] [7/48] i386: divorce CONFIG_X86_PAE from CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G
• Next by Date: [PATCH] Cleanup elevator_ops->trim function
• Previous by thread: Re: [BUGFIX]{PATCH] flush icache on ia64 take2
• Next by thread: Re: [BUGFIX]{PATCH] flush icache on ia64 take2
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]