Re: [PATCH try #3] security: Convert LSM into a static interface

> Please distinguish between "cater to" and "support". If the kernel
> didn't worry about supporting out-of-tree code, then why would there
> be loadable module at all?

Memory usage, flexibility, debugging.

Module support was not added for external modules.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH try #3] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
    • From: "Scott Preece" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH try #3] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
    • From: James Morris <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH try #3] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH try #3] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
    • From: Christian Ehrhardt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH try #3] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
    • From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH try #3] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
    • From: James Morris <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH try #3] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
    • From: "Scott Preece" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [BUGFIX]{PATCH] flush icache on ia64 take2
• Next by Date: Re: net/ipv4/inetpeer.c stack warnings
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH try #3] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH try #3] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]