Re: [PATH 0/1] Kexec jump - v2 - the first step to kexec based hibernation

On Thursday, 19 July 2007 08:43, Huang, Ying wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 18:04 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > I like the idea but I think I'll let people chat about it a bit more
> > before looking at merging the patches, OK?
> 
> I think maybe we should wait for Rafael to separate the device hibernate
> (quiesce and state save) from device suspend.

Well, I'm afraid that will take some time ...

> Without that, the ACPI issue can not be resolved.

Yes, it seems so.

Greetings,
Rafael


-- 
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATH 0/1] Kexec jump - v2 - the first step to kexec based hibernation
    • From: "Huang, Ying" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATH 0/1] Kexec jump - v2 - the first step to kexec based hibernation
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATH 0/1] Kexec jump - v2 - the first step to kexec based hibernation
    • From: "Huang, Ying" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH][RFC] network splice receive v3
• Next by Date: new text patching for review
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATH 0/1] Kexec jump - v2 - the first step to kexec based hibernation
• Next by thread: Re: [PATH 0/1] Kexec jump - v2 - the first step to kexec based hibernation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]