Re: [PATH 0/1] Kexec jump - v2 - the first step to kexec based hibernation

On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 18:04 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I like the idea but I think I'll let people chat about it a bit more
> before looking at merging the patches, OK?

I think maybe we should wait for Rafael to separate the device hibernate
(quiesce and state save) from device suspend. Without that, the ACPI
issue can not be resolved.

Best Regards,
Huang Ying
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATH 0/1] Kexec jump - v2 - the first step to kexec based hibernation
  - From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATH 0/1] Kexec jump - v2 - the first step to kexec based hibernation
  - From: "Huang, Ying" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATH 0/1] Kexec jump - v2 - the first step to kexec based hibernation
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: regression: disk error loop (panic?) ide_do_rw_disk-bad:
Next by Date: Re: System hangs on running kernbench
Previous by thread: Re: [PATH 0/1] Kexec jump - v2 - the first step to kexec based hibernation
Next by thread: Re: [PATH 0/1] Kexec jump - v2 - the first step to kexec based hibernation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]