Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> ...
>> I would consider it more ugly to special case this and that in the
>> kconfig code when plain dependencies already offer exactly the same
>> functionality...
>
> well, this is the *third* time i've proposed adding this kind of
> feature so, at this point, i've really given up caring about it. if
> someone wants to do this, have at it. i have better things to do than
> to keep suggesting it and getting nowhere with it.
For better or worse, it can often be observed that feature requests
don't set anything in motion until a first patch is sent. Even a patch
that is far from perfect can get things going really quickly. (If the
requested feature makes sense to other people.)
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== -=== =--==
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
- Re: [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
- Re: [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
- Re: [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
- Re: [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
- Re: [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
- Re: [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
- Re: [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
- Re: [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]