On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:23:09 -0400 (EDT) Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > there's no point adding all that redundant content when it can all be
> > > done automatically.
> >
> > I like it. Are there any kconfig patches to support this plan?
>
> Speaking specifically to adding 'EXPERIMENTAL', I distinctly
> remember at some point in the past the config system was smart
> enough to print " (EXPERIMENTAL)" if that entry depended on
> CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL.
>
> We should head in that direction.
there's one point i want to re-iterate. i'd prefer to see
EXPERIMENTAL stop being a dependency, as in:
depends on SNAFU && FUBAR && EXPERIMENTAL
"EXPERIMENTAL" is not a dependency in the true sense of the word -- it
is more of an attribute, and i think it would far more sense to see
entries like:
depends on SNAFU && FUBAR
maturity EXPERIMENTAL
sure, it's more work, but i think the cost is worth it in terms of
flexibility (particularly if *i'm* not the one doing the work. :-)
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
