On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> If you are not doing it, noone might do it. And discusing
> improvements noone will implement is somehow pointless...
sure, i'm willing to help, but i don't think doing *nothing* about it
is an option. you may not like gabriel's proposed patch, but you have
to admit that he has a valid objection that should be addressed. so
you can address it the manual and brute force way, or you can invest a
little more time and do it right.
but, either way, i think you have to deal with it. now it's just time
to make a choice.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
- Re: [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
- Re: [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
- Re: [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
- Re: [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
- Re: [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]