Jeff Garzik wrote:
Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:23:09 -0400 (EDT) Robert P. J. Day wrote:
there's no point adding all that redundant content when it can all be
done automatically.
I like it. Are there any kconfig patches to support this plan?
Speaking specifically to adding 'EXPERIMENTAL', I distinctly remember at
some point in the past the config system was smart enough to print "
(EXPERIMENTAL)" if that entry depended on CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL.
We should head in that direction.
I strongly NAK the original patch from Gabriel C in this thread -- it
just adds too much redundant info. Better to add it -once-, somewhere
inside Kconfig system.
Jeff
Yes, that's what Robert & I are referring to as well (AFAIK).
--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]