There is a subtle bug in sysfs_create_link() failure path. When symlink creation fails because there's already a node with the same name, the target sysfs_dirent is put twice - once by failure path of sysfs_create_link() and once more when the symlink is released. Fix it by making only the symlink node responsible for putting target_sd. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]> --- Gabriel, Miles, please verify this fixes your problem. Thanks. fs/sysfs/symlink.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/sysfs/symlink.c b/fs/sysfs/symlink.c index 2f86e04..d056e96 100644 --- a/fs/sysfs/symlink.c +++ b/fs/sysfs/symlink.c @@ -86,7 +86,9 @@ int sysfs_create_link(struct kobject * kobj, struct kobject * target, const char sd = sysfs_new_dirent(name, S_IFLNK|S_IRWXUGO, SYSFS_KOBJ_LINK); if (!sd) goto out_put; + sd->s_elem.symlink.target_sd = target_sd; + target_sd = NULL; /* reference is now owned by the symlink */ sysfs_addrm_start(&acxt, parent_sd); diff --git a/net/core/net-sysfs.c b/net/core/net-sysfs.c - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] sysfs: kill an extra put in sysfs_create_link() failure path
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sysfs: kill an extra put in sysfs_create_link() failure path
- From: "Miles Lane" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sysfs: kill an extra put in sysfs_create_link() failure path
- From: Cornelia Huck <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] sysfs: cosmetic clean up on node creation failure paths
- From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sysfs: kill an extra put in sysfs_create_link() failure path
- References:
- Re: Oops while modprobing phy fixed module
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: Oops while modprobing phy fixed module
- From: Gabriel C <[email protected]>
- Re: Oops while modprobing phy fixed module
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: Oops while modprobing phy fixed module
- From: Gabriel C <[email protected]>
- Re: Oops while modprobing phy fixed module
- From: Gabriel C <[email protected]>
- Re: Oops while modprobing phy fixed module
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: Oops while modprobing phy fixed module
- From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
- Re: Oops while modprobing phy fixed module
- From: Gabriel C <[email protected]>
- Re: Oops while modprobing phy fixed module
- From: Gabriel C <[email protected]>
- Re: Oops while modprobing phy fixed module
- From: Gabriel C <[email protected]>
- Re: Oops while modprobing phy fixed module
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Mark sparc and sparc64 as not having virt_to_bus
- Next by Date: Re: v2.6.21.5-rt19 (sched_getaffinity?)
- Previous by thread: Re: Oops while modprobing phy fixed module
- Next by thread: [PATCH] sysfs: cosmetic clean up on node creation failure paths
- Index(es):