Satyam Sharma wrote:
> On 7/16/07, Gabriel C <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Here the bisect result:
>>
>> 3007e997de91ec59af39a3f9c91595b31ae6e08b is first bad commit
>> commit 3007e997de91ec59af39a3f9c91595b31ae6e08b
>> Author: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
>> Date: Thu Jun 14 04:27:23 2007 +0900
>>
>> sysfs: use sysfs_mutex to protect the sysfs_dirent tree
Hmmm... Weird. The patch is supposed to make synchronization more
strict not less unless I've forgotten locking at some place. Gabriel,
can you please choose SLAB and enable CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB and
DEBUG_SLAB_LEAK and see whether kernel complains about something?
Thanks.
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
