Q: a bogus set_fs(USER_DS) in setup_frame/setup_rt_frame ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I am really puzzled by set_fs(USER_DS) in setup_frame/setup_rt_frame.

How is it possible that current->addr_limit != USER_DS ? If this _is_
possible, how can can we trust the result of access_ok() above?

Thanks in advance,

Oleg.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux