These patches are only for the brave! I have not even tried to compile without lockdep support, one can have both pieces if it breaks :-) -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- [RFC/T PATCH 10/12] lockdep: fs: per file-system type lock_page class
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- [RFC/T PATCH 12/12] mm: set_page_mapping()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- [RFC/T PATCH 11/12] lockdep: lock_page: use per fs-type lock_page class
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- [RFC/T PATCH 07/12] lockdep: non-recursive validation
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- [RFC/T PATCH 03/12] mm: remove raw SetPageLocked() usage
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- [RFC/T PATCH 02/12] mm: trylock_page
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- [RFC/T PATCH 04/12] mm: remove raw ClearPageLocked() usage
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- [RFC/T PATCH 09/12] lockdep: increase MAX_LOCK_DEPTH
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- [RFC/T PATCH 01/12] lockdep: annotate journal_start()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- [RFC/T PATCH 06/12] lockdep: lock_page: handle IO-completions
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- [RFC/T PATCH 05/12] lockdep: add initial lockdep support for lock_page
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- [RFC/T PATCH 08/12] lockdep: lock_page: recursion
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- [RFC/T PATCH 10/12] lockdep: fs: per file-system type lock_page class
- Prev by Date: [RFC/T PATCH 03/12] mm: remove raw SetPageLocked() usage
- Next by Date: [RFC/T PATCH 07/12] lockdep: non-recursive validation
- Previous by thread: [ANNOUNCE] Guilt v0.26
- Next by thread: [RFC/T PATCH 08/12] lockdep: lock_page: recursion
- Index(es):
 |