Re: how about bringing Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt up to date?

Jean Delvare wrote:
> This one took more time than expected,

These words sound strangely familiar, as if I often said them myself.
Can't be.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== -=== =---=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- how about bringing Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt up to date?
  - From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
- Re: how about bringing Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt up to date?
  - From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 09/33] x86-64: update iommu/dma mapping functions to sg helpers
Previous by thread: Re: how about bringing Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt up to date?
Next by thread: [PATCH] Fix user struct leakage with locked IPC shem segment
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]