Re: how about bringing Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt up to date?

I wrote:
> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>   as time goes by, the informational value of the feature removal file
>> is rapidly approaching zero, as alleged deadlines for removal are
>> continually dismissed, while some removal dates as far back as 2005
>> are still in that file.
>>
>>   if those features aren't going to be removed, then will someone at
>> least recalibrate their removal dates and update that file?

Also remember to update contact addresses.

> What:	Video4Linux API 1 ioctls and video_decoder.h from Video devices.
> When:	December 2006

-Who:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>
+Who:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== -=== =----
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- how about bringing Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt up to date?
  - From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
- Re: how about bringing Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt up to date?
  - From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch 6/7] Add common orderly_poweroff()
Next by Date: Re: [BUG] AS io-scheduler.
Previous by thread: Re: how about bringing Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt up to date?
Next by thread: Re: how about bringing Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt up to date?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]