Re: - isapnp-remove-pointless-check-of-type-against-0-in-isapnp_read_tag.patch removed from -mm tree

["Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>]

On 16/07/07, akpm@linux-foundation.org <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> The patch titled
>      isapnp: remove pointless check of 'type' against 0 in isapnp_read_tag()
> has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
>      isapnp-remove-pointless-check-of-type-against-0-in-isapnp_read_tag.patch
>
> This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Subject: isapnp: remove pointless check of 'type' against 0 in isapnp_read_tag()
> From: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
>
> In drivers/pnp/isapnp/core.c::isapnp_read_tag() there is a test of 'type'
> being == 0 a bit down in the function.  That test doesn't make any sense.
> If 'type' could indeed be NULL, then the test happens way too late as we'd
> already have tried to dereference the pointer earlier and looking at the
> callers it also turns out that there is no way type can ever actually be
> NULL.
>
> So the test is completely pointless and should just be removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

I should have included this in the patch changelog, but I forgot.
Credit should be given where credit is due, even for small stuff like
this. So, for the record:
Thanks go to Andrew Morton for pointing out errors in my initial patch
and pointing me at the fact that callers never actually cause a null
'type' - thank you Andrew for your always careful review of even the
most simple of patches.

--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/