Re: [RFC 0/3] lro: Generic Large Receive Offload for TCP traffic

From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 10:12:53 +0100

> I'm not sure that's a good idea.  If current chips can't handle ipv6
> lro there is no way to actually test it and the code will surely bitrot.

Christoph, you can do LRO pretty much completely in software.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC 0/3] lro: Generic Large Receive Offload for TCP traffic (IPv6)
  - From: Jan-Bernd Themann <[email protected]>

References:
- [RFC 0/3] lro: Generic Large Receive Offload for TCP traffic
  - From: Jan-Bernd Themann <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/3] lro: Generic Large Receive Offload for TCP traffic
  - From: David Miller <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/3] lro: Generic Large Receive Offload for TCP traffic
  - From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Blackfin ethernet driver: on chip ethernet MAC controller driver
Next by Date: Increase vmalloc size on kernel >=2.4.27
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC 0/3] lro: Generic Large Receive Offload for TCP traffic
Next by thread: Re: [RFC 0/3] lro: Generic Large Receive Offload for TCP traffic (IPv6)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]