Re: [RFC 0/3] lro: Generic Large Receive Offload for TCP traffic

On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 11:57:48PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> only request is to make this thing able to handle ipv6 as
> well even if no current chips could facilitate that yet.

I'm not sure that's a good idea.  If current chips can't handle ipv6
lro there is no way to actually test it and the code will surely bitrot.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC 0/3] lro: Generic Large Receive Offload for TCP traffic
    • From: David Miller <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC 0/3] lro: Generic Large Receive Offload for TCP traffic
    • From: Jan-Bernd Themann <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC 0/3] lro: Generic Large Receive Offload for TCP traffic
    • From: David Miller <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Text Edit Lock - Architecture Independent Code - kerneldoc
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Blackfin ethernet driver: on chip ethernet MAC controller driver
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC 0/3] lro: Generic Large Receive Offload for TCP traffic
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC 0/3] lro: Generic Large Receive Offload for TCP traffic
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]