On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 10:40:25 -0700 "Nish Aravamudan" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 7/13/07, Joe Jin <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Patch gone too ;) I deleted it. I was hoping that you'd send me the final
> > > finished product (please).
> > >
> >
> > Ha.., the patch against 2.6.22, at your patch have use htlb_alloc_mask, but I
> > cannot found it at 2.6.22 kernel tree, I think you must use difference kernel
> > tree :)
>
> I believe this patch will be unnecessary if my "Fix hugetlb pool
> allocation with empty nodes" patch gets pulled into -mm.
> alloc_fresh_huge_page() now takes a mempolicy which is created by the
> two callers, rather than reinventing interleaving itself. I believe
> this will avoid the oops you saw. I am still waiting on some test
> results (annoying -mm config changes) before I repost them (and they
> depend on Christoph's fixes for memoryless nodes).
Could be so, but the patch which I have queued is nice and simple and
can be backported into 2.6.22.x.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
